Tim Fasano (fasanotampa) Jumps The Shark

Tim Fasano, a Florida Bigfoot Researcher, finally gets caught in his own net of lies and deception. His first hoax attempt, about 2 years ago, was a photo-shopped Bonobo which he tried to pass off as a SkunkApe. Since that time he has allegedly fabricated many tracks and other evidence.

His main objective (along with some of his pals) has been to hoodwink the public into believing he (they) were performing serious Bigfoot Research. While doing this they also set out on a mission to destroy the credibility of any researcher or group that threatened their Youtube subscriber numbers or video view hits. Fasano has been a huge black-eye on the Bigfoot Research Community. We hope he stands by his statement and removes himself from the community.

Links to stories exposing Fasano's latest "Jump The Shark" moment.

http://squatchd.blogspot.com/2011/10/bigfoot-buster-blog-exposed-and-hoaxer.html

http://cryptoflorida.blogspot.com/2011/10/time-to-lay-this-to-rest-once-and-for.html

http://www.ghosttheory.com/2011/10/18/tim-fasano-quits-the-bigfoot-business-sites-death-threat

I'm sure there will be more to come. It's hard to keep track of all this man's lies, but we will set the record straight during the next few weeks on a few things we have first hand knowledge of.

Take care,
Squatch Inc.

An Article Bigfoot Researchers Should Read.

Here is a link to the article "Bigfoot Festival Serious?" Article by The Blogger "Doubtful"

I personally agree with many of the comments made by the author. While there is some evidence that suggests a large bi-pedal creature inhabits North America, researchers far too often rely on anecdotal evidence as gospel and fail to test theories or even form a plausible hypothesis based in logic. Like the author states, people tend to not think critically about the subject, this includes many researchers. Do we need to try unconventional methods and strategies that may look foolish or unproductive? I think the answer is yes, but we also have to be willing to document those attempts and produce data that can show when progress is being made, and when it's not.

All in all I think the author's viewpoint expressed in the article more than likely represents the overall perception the general public has with regards to Bigfoot and Bigfoot Research. We as researchers should be addressing this perception in our own works and studies. It can be done by thinking critically and injecting logic and common sense into the research.

TC @ Squatch Inc.

Squatch Inc.

A video showing what maybe some unique characteristics between gorilla and sasquatch.